|
That's what I keep hearing: "stagnant pools of water". As one who loves simile, metaphor and everything inbetween, this phrase is a gas. To me, it relates to everything: history, culture, friends, family and books. All of which can become quite stagnant over time, leading to the multiplication of blood sucking vermin in the form of angst, repression and just plain boredom. While rereading Kerouac (I've read "On the Road" five times during the past month) I came to realize that the author - as cool and hip as he was - simply does not hold up. Kerouac has become stagnant. One's maturation and experience kills Kerouac, dead. I wanted to love it - again! - each time I read it. In fact, I kept rereading it with the hope that whatever it was that caused me to aspire to beatdom (in my mind, at the very least) during my youth would somehow resurface. Yet, it didn't happen. The entire narrative seemed so bloody false and contrived. Is it possible that a vanguard novel like "On the Road" can become so powerfully overwrought that it, too, morphs into cliche? If so, how sad! There was not one point in the novel where I believed a word or experience being related by Sal Paradise. Of course, it is fiction. I understand that. But, when a philosophy becomes transparent and a way of being becomes cliche, what the fuck is one to do? When history, culture, friends, family and books don't stand up to experience and maturation...? Zounds! I'm surrounded by stagnant pools of water. |
| gnossos@hotmail.com August 3, 2005 11:34 PM PDT kerouac did lose it at the end and became a shut in, killing whatever ideals he had. that where we're sitting now? better to die on the train tracks like neal cassady. on his way to the midget auto races? least hes going somewhere. steal some golf balls. | ||
| Marcuse July 5, 2005 12:07 AM PDT Indeed: what are we to do now? I'm pretty much lost. I just don't buy "it" anymore. The blustery ideas and personalities of Hemingway, Joyce, Miller and Kerouac drive me up the wall! Why? 'Cause I don't believe any of it. I want to believe it. But, I just can't anymore. Of course, I may be wrong and my opinions are TOTALLY based on my own pathetic experiences and relationships. Nevertheless, it all seems so contrived. SO contrived that it is dead. Stagnant. However, what I really like and hold dear from "On the Road" is when Carlo and Dean decide that they "are embarked on a tremendous season together...trying to communicate with absolute honesty and absolute completeness...We’ve had to take benzedrine. We sit on the bed , crosslegged, facing each other. I have finally taught Dean that he can do anything he wants, become mayor of Denver, marry a millionairess, or become the greatest poet since Rimbaud. But he keeps rushing out to see the midget auto races." That is the most truthful part of the entire book: the attempt to be pure and honest is there; but, reality ("rushing out to see midget auto races") supercedes anything philosophical and meaningful. Sigh. So be it. | ||
| Kat July 4, 2005 11:55 PM PDT I felt the same way when I read "On the Road"! What ARE we to do now? | ||
| Leave a Comment: |